El autor en la crítica homérica antigua y moderna: Algunas consideraciones
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this article I discuss the connections between poet, characters and readers. My focus is based on the following question: How is the author imagined by readers, how are the characters imagined by the author and how the characters inspire readers? I have taken my examples from the Homeric tradition and, more specifically, from some manoeuvres of interpretation in ancient exegesis, particularly the so-called ‘solutions from character’, suggesting a connection with modern textual criticism and literary interpretation.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Graziosi, B. (2016). El autor en la crítica homérica antigua y moderna: Algunas consideraciones. Synthesis, 23, e002. Retrieved from https://www.synthesis.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/article/view/SYNe002
Issue
Section
Artículos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es).
References
DACHS, H. (1913) Die lysis ek tou prosopou: Ein exegetischer und kritischer Grundsatz Aristarchs und seine Neuanwendung auf Ilias und Odyssee, Erlangen.
DI BENEDETTO, V. (1998) Nel laboratorio di Omero,Torino.
FANTUZZI, M. (2013) Achilles in Love, Oxford.
FINKELBERG, M. (2000) “The Cypria, the Iliad, and the problem of multiformity in oral and written tradition”, Classical Philology 95: 1-11.
FINKELBERG, M. (2012) "Late features in the speeches of the Iliad", en Andersen, Ø, and Haug, D. T. T. (eds.) Relative Chronology in Early Greek Epic Poetry, Cambridge: 80-95.
FOLEY, J. (2001) Homer’s Traditional Art, University Park.
GRAFTON, A., MOST, G. W., ZETZEL, J. E. G. (1985) F. A. Wolf: Prolegomena to Homer, 1795. Translated with Introduction and Notes, Princeton.
GRAZIOSI, B. and HAUBOLD, J. (2010) Iliad 6: A Commentary, Cambridge.
GRAZIOSI, B. (2015) “Vincenzo Di Benedetto: gli studi omerici”, Annali della Scuola normale Superiore. Classe di Lettere e Filosofia 5, 7.2: 281-98.
HAUBOLD, J. and GRAZIOSI, B. (2015) “The Homeric Text”, Ramus 44 : 1-27
JANKO, R. (1994) “Review of Van Thiel 1991”, Gnomon 66:289-95.
JANKO, R. (2000) “West´s Iliad”, Classical Review 50:1-4.
LAIRD, A. (2009) "Virgil, reception and the myth of biography", CentoPagine 3: 1-9.
NÜNLIST, R. (2009) The Ancient Critic at Work. Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia, Cambridge.
NÜNLIST, R. (2015) "What does Ὅμηρον ἐξ Ὁμήρου σαφηνίζειν actually mean?", Hermes 143: 385-403.
PARRY, M. (1971) The Making of Homeric Verse. The Collected Papers of Milman Parry, ed. A. Parry, Oxford.
PFEIFFER, R. (1968) History of Classical Scholarship, Oxford: 226-7.
PORTER, J. (1992) "Hermeneutic lines and circles: Aristarchus and Crates on the exegesis of Homer", en Lamberton, R. and Keaney, J. J. (eds.) Homer’s Ancient Readers: The Hermeneutics of Greek Epic’s Earliest Exegetes, Princeton.
VAN THIEL, H. (1996), Homeri Ilias, Hildesheim.
WEST, M. L. (1998-2000) Homeri Ilias (2 vols.), Stuttgart/Leipzig.
DI BENEDETTO, V. (1998) Nel laboratorio di Omero,Torino.
FANTUZZI, M. (2013) Achilles in Love, Oxford.
FINKELBERG, M. (2000) “The Cypria, the Iliad, and the problem of multiformity in oral and written tradition”, Classical Philology 95: 1-11.
FINKELBERG, M. (2012) "Late features in the speeches of the Iliad", en Andersen, Ø, and Haug, D. T. T. (eds.) Relative Chronology in Early Greek Epic Poetry, Cambridge: 80-95.
FOLEY, J. (2001) Homer’s Traditional Art, University Park.
GRAFTON, A., MOST, G. W., ZETZEL, J. E. G. (1985) F. A. Wolf: Prolegomena to Homer, 1795. Translated with Introduction and Notes, Princeton.
GRAZIOSI, B. and HAUBOLD, J. (2010) Iliad 6: A Commentary, Cambridge.
GRAZIOSI, B. (2015) “Vincenzo Di Benedetto: gli studi omerici”, Annali della Scuola normale Superiore. Classe di Lettere e Filosofia 5, 7.2: 281-98.
HAUBOLD, J. and GRAZIOSI, B. (2015) “The Homeric Text”, Ramus 44 : 1-27
JANKO, R. (1994) “Review of Van Thiel 1991”, Gnomon 66:289-95.
JANKO, R. (2000) “West´s Iliad”, Classical Review 50:1-4.
LAIRD, A. (2009) "Virgil, reception and the myth of biography", CentoPagine 3: 1-9.
NÜNLIST, R. (2009) The Ancient Critic at Work. Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia, Cambridge.
NÜNLIST, R. (2015) "What does Ὅμηρον ἐξ Ὁμήρου σαφηνίζειν actually mean?", Hermes 143: 385-403.
PARRY, M. (1971) The Making of Homeric Verse. The Collected Papers of Milman Parry, ed. A. Parry, Oxford.
PFEIFFER, R. (1968) History of Classical Scholarship, Oxford: 226-7.
PORTER, J. (1992) "Hermeneutic lines and circles: Aristarchus and Crates on the exegesis of Homer", en Lamberton, R. and Keaney, J. J. (eds.) Homer’s Ancient Readers: The Hermeneutics of Greek Epic’s Earliest Exegetes, Princeton.
VAN THIEL, H. (1996), Homeri Ilias, Hildesheim.
WEST, M. L. (1998-2000) Homeri Ilias (2 vols.), Stuttgart/Leipzig.