Ares y Dionisos: Discurso polí­tico y poesí­a trágica en Fenicias de Eurí­pides

Main Article Content

Brenda López Saiz

Abstract

In this paper, we read Euripides’ Phoenissae as a metadramatic reflection which is developed through the opposition of two semantic fields: on the one hand, war and eris, political power, individual interest and public discourse associated to “sophistic” practices; on the other hand, peace and concord among members of the community; philia bonds, colective well-being and choral mousikÄ“, which in turn are subject of self-referential passages. Through this opposition, we propose that the play poses a critique to the political and military situation faced by Athens between 411 and 409 b.C, and, at the same time, it develops a meta-dramatic reflection about the social function of tragic poetry, opposing it to the new kinds of discourses which, taught by the sophists, prevail in Athenian public sphere. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
López Saiz, B. (2017). Ares y Dionisos: Discurso polí­tico y poesí­a trágica en Fenicias de Eurí­pides. Synthesis, 24(2), e019. https://doi.org/10.24215/1851779Xe019
Section
Artículos
Author Biography

Brenda López Saiz, Universidad de Chile

Magister y doctora en Literatura por la Universidad de Chile. Se desempeña como profesora asistente en el Departamento de Literatura de esa Universidad, donde dicta el curso de Literatura Clásica y seminarios de la especialidad. Sus líneas de investigación se centran en el estudio de la tragedia griega, y en la recepción moderna y contemporánea del drama y la literatura griega. Ha publicado capítulos de libros, artículos en revistas especializadas, y el libro Nación católica y tradición clásica en obras de Leopoldo Marechal (Corregidor).

References

Dunn, F. (1996) Tragedy’s End: Closure and Innovation in Euripidean Drama, Oxford.

Eurí­pides (1998) Fenicias. Introducción, traducción y notas de Garcí­a Gual, C., en Tragedias, vol. III,. Madrid.

Henrichs, A. (1995) “Why should I dance? Choral self-referentiality in Greek tragedy”, Arion 3.1: 56-111.

Henrichs, A. (1996) “Dancing in Athens, Dancing on Delos: Some Patterns of Choral Projection in Euripides”, Philologus 140: 48-62.

Kerferd, G. B. (1981) The Sophistic Movement, Cambridge.

Kovacs, D. (2002) Euripides: Helen, Phoenician Women, Orestes, Cambridge, Mass.

Kowalzig, B. (2004) “Changing Choral Worlds: Song-Dance and Society in Athens and Beyond”, en P. Murray & P. Wilson Music and the Muses: the Culture of MousikÄ“ in the Classical Athenian City, Oxford: 39-66.

Mastronarde, D. (2004) Euripides: Phoenissa, Cambridge.

Mastronarde, D. (2010) The Art of Euripides: Dramatic Technique and Social Context, Cambridge.

Michelini, A. (2009) “The ‘packed-full’ drama in late Euripides: Phoenissae”, en J.R.C. Cousland & J. R. Hume, The Play of Texts and Fragments: Essays in Honour of Martin Cropp, Leiden, Boston: 169-182.

Pfister, M. (1988) The Theory and Analysis of Drama, Cambridge.

Tucí­dides (2007) Historia de la guerra del Peloponeso, Traducción y notas de Juan José Torres Esbarranch, Madrid.

Wohl, V. (2015) Euripides and the Politics of Form, Princeton, Oxford.