The Exogenous Determination of Commentary on Art: Theory of Knowledge, Theory of Language, and Political Theory in Plato

Main Article Content

Roberto Chuit Roganovich

Abstract

In the present work we will try to trace the set of categorical tools that contributed to the early definition of the discipline of art criticism. At this point, the key concept that we are interested in recomposing is that of mimesis and representation, a fundamental theoretical space in the treatment of the problems of art in antiquity and in medieval philosophy. In principle, we will approach the problem from three spaces of the production of meaning: the theory of knowledge, the theory of language and the ethical-political theory. In a second instance we will try to jointly address the dialogue that is established between these three spaces of knowledge to make visible the type of influence that philosophy has exerted on criticism and literary theory.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Chuit Roganovich, R. (2022). The Exogenous Determination of Commentary on Art: Theory of Knowledge, Theory of Language, and Political Theory in Plato. Synthesis, 29(2), e123. https://doi.org/10.24215/1851779Xe123
Section
Artículos

References

Althusser, L. (2015). Iniciación a la filosofía para los no filósofos. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

Badiou, A. (2010). Pequeño manual de Inestética. Buenos Aires: Prometeo Libros.

Bayer, R. (1986). Historia de la estética. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Platón (1986). República. C. Eggers (trad.). En Diálogos IV (pp. 201-243). Madrid: Gredos.

Platón (1992). Crátilo. J . L. Calvo (trad.). En Diálogos II (pp. 339-461). Madrid: Gredos.

Schiller, F. (1795). Cartas sobre la educación estética del hombre. Martín Zubiria (trad). Mendoza: Universidad Nacional de Cuyo.

Tatarkiewicz, W. (2001). Historia de seis ideas: arte, belleza, forma, creatividad, mímesis experiencia estética. España: Tecnos.

Viñas Piquer, D. (2002). Historia de la crítica literaria. Barcelona: Ariel.